Security and Stability in Pakistan: Developments in U.S. Policy and Funding

Posted - May 2, 2010

“There is no security relationship in the world today more important than the relationship between the United States military and the military of Pakistan” – Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO)

-          Democrats and Republicans expressed concern about the administration’s aid proposals for Pakistan, want to see more info to better assess aid distribution and effectiveness

-          Pentagon acknowledged that Pakistan must develop “hold” and “build” capabilities to improve security

-          Lawmakers questioned the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal

Michèle Flournoy, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Pentagon

Flournoy made clear from the outset that U.S. policy is directed towards long-term strategic goals and that the U.S. “isn’t leaving anytime soon.” She argued that American investments in the country have already had an effect on insurgents and their strategy.

In an attempt to dispel concerns over the safety of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, Flournoy said the country’s military has a “strong command and control” system in place. She characterized the Pakistani military as a historically “strong institution.”

She said Washington needs to reassure Islamabad that it is not exposing itself to increased risk along its eastern border. “Although extremist attacks have led to the repositioning of substantial Pakistani forces, Pakistan’s strategic concerns about India remain pre-eminent,” Flournoy told lawmakers.

While acknowledging the desire to eventually replace Pakistan’s helicopter with U.S. equipment, she defended the recent decision to upgrade Pakistan current fleet – in response to questions from lawmakers –  based on urgent, short-term security considerations.

Andrew J. Shapiro, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, State Department

Asst. Sec. Shapiro also highlighted the long-term perspective the Department of State is taking when dealing with Pakistan. He discussed current programs, including: the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program (funded by State, implemented by Pentagon), the Foreign Military Financing (FMF) program and the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF).

Shapiro said they are seeking future increases in IMET to help bridge the gap created in U.S.-Pakistani military exchanges during the years Pakistan was sanctioned – which prevented Pakistani military officials from attending training in the U.S.

WordPress Plugin Share Bookmark Email

Share

Comments are closed.